So, I got to thinking about something the other day. Most people will agree that people are the most intelligent life forms on Earth. (I know some of you out there will try to make a case for dolphins being pretty smart; but really, when was the last time a dolphin came up with a new app for the iPhone? Get real.) So; say you have an employee who seems incapable of learning even the simplest of tasks. You speak to him and he might briefly glance at you before going back to whatever he’s doing but more likely he completely ignores you. The only time he shows a hint of interest is when you offer him food. Would you say that this person is extremely independent and highly intelligent? Or would you say that if he was any dumber you’d have to water him twice a week?

Now let’s say you have an employee who is extremely loyal to you. He’s always doing his very best to learn whatever you try to teach him. He may be a bit of a suck-up, but deep down he just wants to make you happy with his performance. Would you think that he’s so stupid you have to walk behind him with a plastic bag when he goes outside? Or would you think, “This guy could be my best friend”?

Now let’s apply this analogy to the animal world; specifically cats and dogs. All the cat people out there would have you believe that those creatures are so independent that they won’t take orders from a mere human. And, supposedly, dogs are too dumb to think for themselves. Personally, I just don’t have much use for cats who want to be either let in or out of the house every hour on the hour while I am trying to get some sleep on my friends couch. On the other hand though, I don’t really enjoy constantly being licked when the family pet wants attention (but if people would raise their children better that wouldn’t be an issue).

From this rant you might assume that I am a “dog-person”. It is true that I like dogs far more than cats, but I consider myself to be a “beaver-person”. They’re just so cute and furry. I love to bury my face in them. And they make great watch-dogs. They’ll always slap their tails whenever danger is nearby. I even got myself a bumper sticker, “Honk if you like beaver”. You’d be surprised at how many drivers will honk their horns at you. Strangely though, it’s almost exclusively men.

From time to time, I like to offer up movie reviews.  However, this is not one of those times.  I merely wish to enter into a deep philosophical discussion that came about from watching the movie “Surrogates”.  In case anyone out there is not familiar with the film here is a very brief plot synopsis.  In the future several breakthroughs with robot and virtual-reality technology will allow all human beings to put their consciousness into a robot body and send their surrogates out into the world while their bodies stay safe and sound at home.  Naturally, almost everyone chooses a robot body that is much more beautiful than their physical one (in one interesting example a fat, balding 40-something man uses a slender, attractive, blond 20-something woman as his surrogate).  The indication, in the movie, is that no one ever leaves the “safety” of their own home anymore without using a robot body (except for the “radicals” who absolutely refuse to ever use a surrogate, but that’s a different subplot which doesn’t directly affect my point here).

So everyone is running around in their beautiful robot bodies.  This got me to thinking about where our society is headed seeing as this sort of thing is already happening online.  Ordinary looking people are using beautiful avatars when they interact with other people on sites like “Second-Life”.  And you can bet that half of the hot, elven maidens in “World of Warcraft” are actually ugly men in the real world.

After pondering this idea for a little while, something vastly more alarming suddenly occurred to me.  When I realized this it really shook me to the core of my being.  In the future that this movie shows: THERE WOULD BE NO MORE RESTAURANTS.  My gods, think about it.  No one goes out without their robot-body – robots don’t eat – there would be no need for restaurants.  Now, maybe it’s possible that these surrogates are sophisticated enough to have some human senses.  Obviously they can see and hear and they appear to have a sense of touch.  You would think that smell would be a good idea; someone needs to be able to detect gas leaks after all.  So taste might not be a great stretch. But because the robot couldn’t eat food, it would have to be some sort of a chemical lubricant that is designed to taste like sous-vide beaver cheeks or else just a couple of lines of downloaded code so that the user-interface simulates the taste of prairie oysters.

On the other hand, though, fast-food chains that were strictly delivery would be doing huge volumes of business.

A little while back, I read the book “Hannibal Rising”; which is all about the formative years of Hannibal “The Cannibal” Lector.  At one point a teenage Hannibal is getting some culinary lessons from a French Chef.  The Chef says that the cheeks of an animal are a delicacy.  When you are carving one is supposed to be presented to the lady of the house and the other to the guest of honour.

Now for a while I wondered if this idea was, perhaps, made up by Thomas Harris.  After all we butchered our own animals when I was growing up on the farm and I had never heard of such a thing.  However, just the other day I attended a wine and food festival.  At one of the booths they had beef cheeks.  I tried one and found it to be very tasty and surprisingly tender.

Thus, I have been inspired to create a new dish for The Redneck Bar & Grill.  A 48-hr. sous-vide beaver cheek with garlic infused puree of root vegetables and a pink-peppercorn demi-glace.  Watch for it on the new menu.

Well, I’m busier than a one-toothed beaver in the Forests of Ubangme this week-end. So instead of me writing a post I’ll just upload a video from YouTube. Here’s James At War giving a pretty accurate (in my opinion) description of todays pop-stars. Enjoy.